Willems on theoretical engineering

Jan Willems on theoretical engineering research:

One of the differences in working in a mathematics versus a theoretical engineering environment is psychological. Both fields feel insufficiently appreciated. Mathematics reacts to this by blaming the ‘others’, for misunderstanding them. Engineering reacts by blaming ‘themselves’, for not doing ‘the right thing’. Discussions about theoretical engineering research often feels like visiting a graveyard in the company of Nietzsche. From the beginning of my career until now, I have always been hearing that ‘the field is dead’, ‘circuit theory is dead’, ‘information theory is dead’, ‘coding theory is dead’, ‘control theory is dead’, ‘system theory is dead’, ‘linear system theory is dead’,\mathcal{H}_{\infty} is dead’. Good science, however, is always alive. The community may not appreciate the vibrancy of good ideas, but it is there. The absence of this impatience is one of the things that makes working in a mathematics department simply more pleasant.

__________

Source:

Jan C. Willems, In Control, Almost from the Beginning Until the Day After Tomorrow [pdf], European Journal of Control, vol. 13, p. 75, 2007.

About these ads

Tags: , , , , ,

One Response to “Willems on theoretical engineering”

  1. Patrick Says:

    This post is neat! I never read that article by Willems. As a teacher of systems theory and control to undergrads, I think I will use this article in the classroom. Thanks for digging it up!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 76 other followers

%d bloggers like this: